Arkansas at Vandy, 1-6-22, 7:30 p.m.
Moderators: kerrigjl, BrentVU, jfgogold, NateSY, KarenYates, Vandyman74, roanoke, VandyWhit
- admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8680
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 3:44 pm
- Location: VandyVille
- Has thanked: 59 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
- Contact:
Re: Arkansas at Vandy, 1-6-22, 7:30 p.m.
Nice to be 1-0 in the SEC for the first time in a long time. Ralph is a solid head coach.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Don Yates - Publisher, http://www.vandymania.com
Don Yates - Publisher, http://www.vandymania.com
Re: Arkansas at Vandy, 1-6-22, 7:30 p.m.
On the plus side (in addition to the final score), we had only 13 TOs, which is good for us. Not so good - 38.5% shooting from the field, 22.2% from 3-pt range.
-
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 12:12 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Versus75
- Admiral
- Posts: 7821
- Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 12:19 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 40 times
Re: Arkansas at Vandy, 1-6-22, 7:30 p.m.
VANDERBILT SHOOTING
1st half:
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 4 -15 ... .267
3-pointers .. 2 - 7 ... .429
Layups ...... 4 - 9 ... .444
2nd half:
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 3 - 7 ... .429
3-pointers .. 0 - 2 ... .000
Layups ...... 7 -12 ... .583
VANDERBILT GAME
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 7 -22 ... .318
3-pointers .. 2 - 9 ... .333
Layups ..... 11 -21 ... .524
ARKANSAS GAME
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 2 -12 ... .167
3-pointers .. 9 -33 ... .409
Layups ...... 8 -21 ... .381
*Effective Field Goal Percentage
Vanderbilt cut down on the mid- to long-range two-point shots in the second half while Arkansas relied on 3-pointers and layups the entire game. But the Hogs didn't get the ball to one of its hot 3-point shooters for the final attempt.
Some other stats I found interesting:
Arkansas committed 6 turnovers in the first quarter after the announcers made a big deal of the team averaging only 11.5 turnovers per game -- sixth in Division I is what I believe they said. The Razorbacks ended up with only 12 turnovers compared to 13 for the Commodores. Yet, Vanderbilt made the most of turnovers by scoring 13 points compared to 4 points off turnovers for Arkansas.
Arkansas snared 13 offensive rebounds to 9 for Vanderbilt, but the "Second Chance Points" were nearly equal ... 7 to 6 in favor of Arkansas.
1st half:
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 4 -15 ... .267
3-pointers .. 2 - 7 ... .429
Layups ...... 4 - 9 ... .444
2nd half:
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 3 - 7 ... .429
3-pointers .. 0 - 2 ... .000
Layups ...... 7 -12 ... .583
VANDERBILT GAME
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 7 -22 ... .318
3-pointers .. 2 - 9 ... .333
Layups ..... 11 -21 ... .524
ARKANSAS GAME
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 2 -12 ... .167
3-pointers .. 9 -33 ... .409
Layups ...... 8 -21 ... .381
*Effective Field Goal Percentage
Vanderbilt cut down on the mid- to long-range two-point shots in the second half while Arkansas relied on 3-pointers and layups the entire game. But the Hogs didn't get the ball to one of its hot 3-point shooters for the final attempt.
Some other stats I found interesting:
Arkansas committed 6 turnovers in the first quarter after the announcers made a big deal of the team averaging only 11.5 turnovers per game -- sixth in Division I is what I believe they said. The Razorbacks ended up with only 12 turnovers compared to 13 for the Commodores. Yet, Vanderbilt made the most of turnovers by scoring 13 points compared to 4 points off turnovers for Arkansas.
Arkansas snared 13 offensive rebounds to 9 for Vanderbilt, but the "Second Chance Points" were nearly equal ... 7 to 6 in favor of Arkansas.
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 1:25 pm
- Has thanked: 48 times
- Been thanked: 122 times
Re: Arkansas at Vandy, 1-6-22, 7:30 p.m.
Good stuff. I'm a little bit surprised to see Arkansas shot 40 percent from three. You'd pretty much take that every night. Other than that one streak in the second half when she hit four in a row, we did a great job on Ramirez overall. She's scary because her range is just about unlimited and she gets it off so fast. Late in the game, coach Ralph got a lot more aggressive with her, and it worked for the most part.Versus75 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 06, 2022 10:06 pm VANDERBILT SHOOTING
1st half:
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 4 -15 ... .267
3-pointers .. 2 - 7 ... .429
Layups ...... 4 - 9 ... .444
2nd half:
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 3 - 7 ... .429
3-pointers .. 0 - 2 ... .000
Layups ...... 7 -12 ... .583
VANDERBILT GAME
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 7 -22 ... .318
3-pointers .. 2 - 9 ... .333
Layups ..... 11 -21 ... .524
ARKANSAS GAME
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 2 -12 ... .167
3-pointers .. 9 -33 ... .409
Layups ...... 8 -21 ... .381
*Effective Field Goal Percentage
Vanderbilt cut down on the mid- to long-range two-point shots in the second half while Arkansas relied on 3-pointers and layups the entire game. But the Hogs didn't get the ball to one of its hot 3-point shooters for the final attempt.
Some other stats I found interesting:
Arkansas committed 6 turnovers in the first quarter after the announcers made a big deal of the team averaging only 11.5 turnovers per game -- sixth in Division I is what I believe they said. The Razorbacks ended up with only 12 turnovers compared to 13 for the Commodores. Yet, Vanderbilt made the most of turnovers by scoring 13 points compared to 4 points off turnovers for Arkansas.
Arkansas snared 13 offensive rebounds to 9 for Vanderbilt, but the "Second Chance Points" were nearly equal ... 7 to 6 in favor of Arkansas.
-
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 12:12 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
Re: Arkansas at Vandy, 1-6-22, 7:30 p.m.
MikeADore wrote: ↑Thu Jan 06, 2022 10:17 pmGood stuff. I'm a little bit surprised to see Arkansas shot 40 percent from three. You'd pretty much take that every night. Other than that one streak in the second half when she hit four in a row, we did a great job on Ramirez overall. She's scary because her range is just about unlimited and she gets it off so fast. Late in the game, coach Ralph got a lot more aggressive with her, and it worked for the most part.Versus75 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 06, 2022 10:06 pm VANDERBILT SHOOTING
1st half:
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 4 -15 ... .267
3-pointers .. 2 - 7 ... .429
Layups ...... 4 - 9 ... .444
2nd half:
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 3 - 7 ... .429
3-pointers .. 0 - 2 ... .000
Layups ...... 7 -12 ... .583
VANDERBILT GAME
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 7 -22 ... .318
3-pointers .. 2 - 9 ... .333
Layups ..... 11 -21 ... .524
ARKANSAS GAME
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 2 -12 ... .167
3-pointers .. 9 -33 ... .409
Layups ...... 8 -21 ... .381
*Effective Field Goal Percentage
Vanderbilt cut down on the mid- to long-range two-point shots in the second half while Arkansas relied on 3-pointers and layups the entire game. But the Hogs didn't get the ball to one of its hot 3-point shooters for the final attempt.
Some other stats I found interesting:
Arkansas committed 6 turnovers in the first quarter after the announcers made a big deal of the team averaging only 11.5 turnovers per game -- sixth in Division I is what I believe they said. The Razorbacks ended up with only 12 turnovers compared to 13 for the Commodores. Yet, Vanderbilt made the most of turnovers by scoring 13 points compared to 4 points off turnovers for Arkansas.
Arkansas snared 13 offensive rebounds to 9 for Vanderbilt, but the "Second Chance Points" were nearly equal ... 7 to 6 in favor of Arkansas.
[/quote
That number is wrong on the 3pt %- 9/33 is 28%.
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 1:25 pm
- Has thanked: 48 times
- Been thanked: 122 times
Re: Arkansas at Vandy, 1-6-22, 7:30 p.m.
Doubledore wrote: ↑Thu Jan 06, 2022 10:48 pmYeah, that's more what it felt like. The 40 percent was "effective field goal percentage".MikeADore wrote: ↑Thu Jan 06, 2022 10:17 pmGood stuff. I'm a little bit surprised to see Arkansas shot 40 percent from three. You'd pretty much take that every night. Other than that one streak in the second half when she hit four in a row, we did a great job on Ramirez overall. She's scary because her range is just about unlimited and she gets it off so fast. Late in the game, coach Ralph got a lot more aggressive with her, and it worked for the most part.Versus75 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 06, 2022 10:06 pm VANDERBILT SHOOTING
1st half:
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 4 -15 ... .267
3-pointers .. 2 - 7 ... .429
Layups ...... 4 - 9 ... .444
2nd half:
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 3 - 7 ... .429
3-pointers .. 0 - 2 ... .000
Layups ...... 7 -12 ... .583
VANDERBILT GAME
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 7 -22 ... .318
3-pointers .. 2 - 9 ... .333
Layups ..... 11 -21 ... .524
ARKANSAS GAME
SHOT ....... FG-ATT .... EFF%*
Jumpers ..... 2 -12 ... .167
3-pointers .. 9 -33 ... .409
Layups ...... 8 -21 ... .381
*Effective Field Goal Percentage
Vanderbilt cut down on the mid- to long-range two-point shots in the second half while Arkansas relied on 3-pointers and layups the entire game. But the Hogs didn't get the ball to one of its hot 3-point shooters for the final attempt.
Some other stats I found interesting:
Arkansas committed 6 turnovers in the first quarter after the announcers made a big deal of the team averaging only 11.5 turnovers per game -- sixth in Division I is what I believe they said. The Razorbacks ended up with only 12 turnovers compared to 13 for the Commodores. Yet, Vanderbilt made the most of turnovers by scoring 13 points compared to 4 points off turnovers for Arkansas.
Arkansas snared 13 offensive rebounds to 9 for Vanderbilt, but the "Second Chance Points" were nearly equal ... 7 to 6 in favor of Arkansas.
[/quote
That number is wrong on the 3pt %- 9/33 is 28%.
-
- Seaman
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2022 9:29 pm
Re: Arkansas at Vandy, 1-6-22, 7:30 p.m.
The last time the men and women each had a 4+ win streak that included conference games was February 2008. We are in good shape
- charlestonalum
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 13165
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 5:37 am
- Location: Charleston, SC
- Has thanked: 101 times
- Been thanked: 81 times
- Contact:
Re: Arkansas at Vandy, 1-6-22, 7:30 p.m.
Just watched replay - much like men: we won with tenacious defense and a whole lot of layups in the paint. We were ahead the entire game, but never comfortably, but found a way to win. Great game to win, coach's first conference game. Good to get the win against a decent opponent. Plenty to work on, too.
Re: Arkansas at Vandy, 1-6-22, 7:30 p.m.
What's the difference between plain old "field goal percentage" and "effective field goal percentage"?
Re: Arkansas at Vandy, 1-6-22, 7:30 p.m.
The effective field goal percentage is a statistic used in basketball to take into consideration the additional difficulty of three-point shots and the extra points awarded for making a three-pointer. Effective Field Goal Percentage, or eFG%, is calculated the following way: (2pt FGM + (1.5 * 3pt FGM)) / FGA
- geeznotagain
- Admiral
- Posts: 8877
- Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2016 4:04 pm
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 72 times
Re: Arkansas at Vandy, 1-6-22, 7:30 p.m.
These ladies are tough, and they are fighters. If COVID were to impact us in such a way that we had only 4 eligible players, and if the league allowed it (which of course they do not), I think those 4 would suit up and say "let's play" and fight like hell to win the next game. That has not always been the case.