OT: Jeremy Pruitt vs. UT could get... very interesting!
Moderators: kerrigjl, BrentVU, jfgogold, NateSY, KarenYates, Vandyman74, roanoke, VandyWhit
- BrentVU
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17708
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 1:25 pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 180 times
OT: Jeremy Pruitt vs. UT could get... very interesting!
USA Today: Jeremy Pruitt's lawyer threatens fiery lawsuit as Tennessee refuses settlement with ex-Vols coach
https://www.tennessean.com/story/sports ... 519069002/
The University of Tennessee once agreed that Pruitt would be owed a buyout of $12.6 million if he was fired without cause. In January, UT fired Pruitt for cause – meaning Pruitt was owed nothing. I’d imagine Pruitt disagreed, and needless to say, he was going to lawyer up and fight for his $12.6 million.
Wouldn’t you?
Evidence of the inevitable legal scrap wasn’t the surprising part of Tuesday’s bombshell exclusive by USA TODAY Network colleague Blake Toppmeyer.
No, the surprising part of the correspondence was that Tennessee isn’t negotiating a settlement and doesn’t appear to be backing down at all to threats from Pruitt's side...
UT is puffing its chest out, too. It appears willing to go to court – and risk all types of unflattering information coming to light - rather than give Pruitt a nickel. Bring it on, the university seems to be telling Pruitt's attorney Michael Lyons.
So grab your popcorn, folks. This is about to get goooood.
Tennessean columnist Gentry Estes: Jeremy Pruitt vs. Tennessee is about to get good — and I’m here for it
https://www.tennessean.com/story/sports ... -NLETTER65 ?
https://www.tennessean.com/story/sports ... 519069002/
The University of Tennessee once agreed that Pruitt would be owed a buyout of $12.6 million if he was fired without cause. In January, UT fired Pruitt for cause – meaning Pruitt was owed nothing. I’d imagine Pruitt disagreed, and needless to say, he was going to lawyer up and fight for his $12.6 million.
Wouldn’t you?
Evidence of the inevitable legal scrap wasn’t the surprising part of Tuesday’s bombshell exclusive by USA TODAY Network colleague Blake Toppmeyer.
No, the surprising part of the correspondence was that Tennessee isn’t negotiating a settlement and doesn’t appear to be backing down at all to threats from Pruitt's side...
UT is puffing its chest out, too. It appears willing to go to court – and risk all types of unflattering information coming to light - rather than give Pruitt a nickel. Bring it on, the university seems to be telling Pruitt's attorney Michael Lyons.
So grab your popcorn, folks. This is about to get goooood.
Tennessean columnist Gentry Estes: Jeremy Pruitt vs. Tennessee is about to get good — and I’m here for it
https://www.tennessean.com/story/sports ... -NLETTER65 ?
Re: OT: Jeremy Pruitt vs. UT could get... very interesting!
Ole Bullet head may be a weapon of mass destruction
- OldDude
- Vice Admiral
- Posts: 4508
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2016 4:59 pm
- Location: Bellevue
- Has thanked: 123 times
- Been thanked: 53 times
Re: OT: Jeremy Pruitt vs. UT could get... very interesting!
Maybe we should start a Go Fund Me page to help Pruitt with legal expenses. Bet there are a lot of fans of Bama, Georgia, KY, Florida, Ole Miss, Auburn .........wow, this list got long real quick.
Re: OT: Jeremy Pruitt vs. UT could get... very interesting!
It sounds to me like plain old extortion. He isn't arguing that he is innocent of the charges, or that UT didn't have cause to fire him, but that if he isn't paid off, he will expose UT to a lot of bad publicity involving more violations involving other programs besides football than has been made public. UT has to decide if the lawyer will follow through if they won't settle and he won't get paid, or if he does, how much will the NCAA do about the new evidence. Given the NCAA's history, there is a non-zero chance nothing would come from additional evidence. Still, it is a dangerous game. It is like speeding: Everyone may be doing it, but you don't want to be the one pulled over, because that isn't a good defense.
-
- Admiral
- Posts: 6530
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 7:34 pm
- Location: Clarksville, TN
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: OT: Jeremy Pruitt vs. UT could get... very interesting!
ut has put itself in a Catch-22. If Pruitt was fired "for cause" and that cause was NCAA violations as reported, then they are setting themselves up for sanctions. But, I'm hearing people who claim to know somebody who knows somebody who's nephew cuts the grass of the assistant AD's HVAC guy who are saying there is no credible evidence of real violations, it was just innuendo and rumors spread by opponents. If they stick by that story (and I'm not suggesting that even ut is that stupid), the liability suit that Pruitt and staff hits them with may drive them to bankruptcy.
-
- Captain
- Posts: 861
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2016 11:36 am
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: OT: Jeremy Pruitt vs. UT could get... very interesting!
“No, the surprising part of the correspondence was that Tennessee isn’t negotiating a settlement and doesn’t appear to be backing down at all “
My take is either UT is so broke from paying out all those previously failed coaches that they don’t have the money to pay Germy or they’re just too stupid to make a deal to keep the issues in house. Either way this doesn’t have a good look.
My take is either UT is so broke from paying out all those previously failed coaches that they don’t have the money to pay Germy or they’re just too stupid to make a deal to keep the issues in house. Either way this doesn’t have a good look.
- BILTMORE
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 11121
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2016 2:56 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: OT: Jeremy Pruitt vs. UT could get... very interesting!
it's definitely an extortive maneuver, but I'm not sure it can be just written off as a gun-to-the-head. If he can demonstrate that this behavior, unethical though it is, is not only tolerated abut tacitly expected in order to keep your job, then he can counter the "for cause" justification of his firing.katmai wrote: ↑Wed Oct 20, 2021 12:55 pm It sounds to me like plain old extortion. He isn't arguing that he is innocent of the charges, or that UT didn't have cause to fire him, but that if he isn't paid off, he will expose UT to a lot of bad publicity involving more violations involving other programs besides football than has been made public. UT has to decide if the lawyer will follow through if they won't settle and he won't get paid, or if he does, how much will the NCAA do about the new evidence. Given the NCAA's history, there is a non-zero chance nothing would come from additional evidence. Still, it is a dangerous game. It is like speeding: Everyone may be doing it, but you don't want to be the one pulled over, because that isn't a good defense.
But then as I type this, I can't see UT paying precisely for that reason. Wouldn't paying under those circumstances be an admission of the very thing I'm talking about?
- charlestonalum
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 13165
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 5:37 am
- Location: Charleston, SC
- Has thanked: 101 times
- Been thanked: 81 times
- Contact:
Re: OT: Jeremy Pruitt vs. UT could get... very interesting!
A perfect storm: just like the one that rained bottles and other debris down on Neyland Stadium Saturday. When it rains it pours - just too bad.
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 2016
- Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2021 10:37 pm
- Has thanked: 26 times
- Been thanked: 37 times
Re: OT: Jeremy Pruitt vs. UT could get... very interesting!
Wouldn't his lawyer get a chunk of that 12.6 million if they win?
Didn't that lawyer win a 2.5 million coach fired (breach of contract/buyout) case a while back?
-
- Vice Admiral
- Posts: 2620
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:37 pm
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: OT: Jeremy Pruitt vs. UT could get... very interesting!
He can allege all kind of supposed violations. But, does he have any proof, such as memos or copies of emails? Maybe not. In that case it is just hot air, unless his lawyer can find something during discovery. Tennessee will vigorously fight any fishing expedition.
-
- Admiral
- Posts: 9918
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 12:29 pm
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 124 times
Re: OT: Jeremy Pruitt vs. UT could get... very interesting!
Depends. If the case is as a breach of contract it might not be on a percentage basis. Still, I'd rather have 60% of 12.6 million than none of it.MrMemorial wrote: ↑Wed Oct 20, 2021 4:31 pmWouldn't his lawyer get a chunk of that 12.6 million if they win?
Didn't that lawyer win a 2.5 million coach fired (breach of contract/buyout) case a while back?
- geeznotagain
- Admiral
- Posts: 8877
- Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2016 4:04 pm
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 72 times
Re: OT: Jeremy Pruitt vs. UT could get... very interesting!
I'll be surprised if it ever goes to trial. One or both will eventually blink, and settle. It's the American way.
Re: OT: Jeremy Pruitt vs. UT could get... very interesting!
So what if he has dirty laundry to air. Who is left to be fired? Would there really be harsh sanctions levied by NCAA. They seem much more toothless theses days. A "bad Look" does not seem to bother the institution much less the fanbase. The vast majority would be in favor of pay to play if it meant wins.
Looks like a cheap payoff of about $250-$400K range just to avoid legal expenses.
Looks like a cheap payoff of about $250-$400K range just to avoid legal expenses.