Main VandyMania.com Page
POLITICAL, RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS DISCUSSIONS ARE NOT ALLOWED.
Veterans are increasingly hard to find on recent rosters led by Mike Krzyzewski and John Calipari. In the one-and-done era, no team has ever earned a No. 1 seed in the NCAA tournament with a roster that returned fewer than 30 percent of its possession minutes from the previous season. Duke has now come in under that 30 percent threshold in two of the last three seasons. Kentucky has done so every year since its undefeated run to the 2015 Final Four
Very young Duke and Kentucky teams can, of course, still be very good. But the best teams that these programs have produced over the last decade have, without exception, been older. Whether your preferred example is the Kentucky team that won the 2012 national title (while returning 53 percent of its possession minutes from the previous season), the Duke team that won it all in the 2015 tournament (42 percent) or even the UK team that came up just short that same season (60), these were all rosters that were more experienced than what we've seen from the two programs over the last three seasons.
It raises the possibility of whether success at recruiting one-and-done-track talent might be too much of a good thing. The very trait that defines Duke and Kentucky -- the ability to land the best talent -- is turning out to be imperfectly correlated to the ultimate objective, putting the best team on the floor.
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basket ... ne-rosters
I'm assuming a positive response to my question, if we don't get Langford.
Users browsing this forum: 4timenatlchamps, AirForceDore, Cardsanddores, commadore, EllistonVU, Foreverhopeful, Georgiadore, Google Adsense [Bot], JPick44, katmai, Lundy, mathguy, Matt2309, Mcflash, mydores, PeteFox, Seadog73, Souldore, Starkiller, TwoSaints, UltimateVUFan, VandyBeck, vandyeast, Vandyjackson, vandywbbfan, VUPKS and 165 guests